Modernizing Access
Gateways — Zero UI Disruption
External Decoupling keeps existing channels and integrations calling CTG, MQ, IMS,
and database endpoints exactly as before throughout the modernization
transformation journey
Why External Decoupling Matters
In many enterprises, external apps and channels connect directly to legacy technologies such as
CTG, MQ, IMS, or shared databases. That makes those integration points fragile: any change in the
backend risks breaking consumers, and modernization options become limited.
Even if you move these gateways or databases to the cloud, the tight coupling remains - consumers
are still bound to legacy interfaces and protocols.
External Decoupling changes the game:
Protects consumers and channels
Web, mobile, partner apps, and ESBs continue to “call CTG/MQ/DB” as they do today. No UI changes, no contract churn.
Enables invisible modernization
Core systems can be rehosted, refactored, or replaced behind the scenes while traffic is bridged to new services
Reduces migration risk
You can cut over specific flows and queues gradually, with controlled rollback.
Builds future flexibility
Once transition is complete, legacy gateways can be retired without forcing changes on upstream apps
Where Internal Decoupling builds a bridge inside the application, External Decoupling builds a bridge at the edge between
existing access gateways and your modern cloud services so you get zero UI disruption and full continuity
What Is the External Decoupling Pattern?
External Decoupling is a modernization pattern that redirects existing CTG, MQ, IMS, or database
traffic into modern cloud services without changing user-facing channels or integrations.
In practice:
- External apps continue to use their existing connection methods (CTG program calls, MQ queues, DB endpoints).
- An Interceptor sits in front of those endpoints and forwards requests to an OpenLegacy bridge, which exposes modern services (for example, Java APIs running on Kubernetes).
- To each external app, it still looks like it’s calling CTG/MQ/DB—only the actual execution has moved.
This delivers:
- Stability on the outside – No rewrites for existing consumers.
- Flexibility on the inside – Business logic can be rehosted, refactored, or replaced incrementally.
- A clear modernization bridge – Once enough flows are migrated, legacy gateways can be phased out safely.
Step‑By‑Step Implementation with
OpenLegacy Hub
AS-IS State
External systems are tightly coupled to legacy endpoints
Planning
Modernization Planner identifies which gateway traffic to redirect to modern services
The Gap
Modernizing the backend alone breaks existing connections—without a bridge
The Bridge
OpenLegacy generates adapters that transform and reroute legacy traffic
End-State
Legacy channels remain online while the backend modernizes seamlessly.
Keep the connections. Modernize the core.
How External Decoupling Works with
OpenLegacy Hub
External Decoupling isn’t just an architecture pattern; OpenLegacy Hub
automates it end-to-end.
Discover Gateway Traffic
- Modernization Planner and Analyzer auto-detect CTG programs, IMS routes, MQ queues, and direct DB connections, plus their payload schemas and usage.
- You see which external systems depend on which gateways and what traffic they carry.
A clear map of gateway dependencies and candidates for decoupling.
Planner Proposes Decoupling Plan
- Planner groups flows by domain (e.g., Accounts, Claims, Orders) and suggests where External Decoupling should be applied first.
- You review priorities (“start with partner APIs” or “start with portals”) and approve waves.
An incremental, domain-driven External Decoupling roadmap.
Integration Studio Generates Assets
- One click creates: listener stubs for MQ/CTG, payload mappers, and secure REST endpoints.
- Policies enforce naming, security (TLS/OAuth2/JWT), and deployment standards automatically.
A concrete, generated bridge between gateways and modern services.
Deploy Adapter & Refactor Logic
- The OpenLegacy adapter runs where you need it: z/OS USS, Linux on Z, or Kubernetes.
- Modernized services (e.g., Java microservices) are developed and deployed independently in your cloud of choice.
Legacy gateways feed modern services without changing external call patterns.
Cut Over Incrementally
- Use routing rules and traffic splitting to gradually redirect % of messages or calls from the legacy core to new services.
- If KPIs dip, simply re-point traffic back to COBOL/legacy logic
Controlled, reversible cutovers—no “all-or-nothing” switch.
Observe & Harden
- Built-in metrics, tracing, and audit logs feed your existing DevSecOps stack (APM/logging tools).
- You tune, harden, and decommission legacy endpoints once traffic has migrated.
A repeatable External Decoupling approach you can apply to additional gateways and domains
How OpenLegacy Removes the Risk
with External Decoupling
OpenLegacy eliminates integration risks by safely exposing APIs and services using proven patterns and automated tooling.
No channel disturbance
5250/3270, IVR, and batch jobs keep working unchanged.
AI‑assisted automation
Adapters and tests generate in minutes rather than weeks.
Structured rollback
Simply re‑point the gateway to the COBOL core if needed.
Enterprise‑grade security
TLS, OAuth2, field‑level encryption, audit logs
Ready to modernize external gateways with zero UI disruption?
Redirect CTG, MQ, IMS, and database traffic to modern cloud services while all channels and
integrations continue to work as-is—with no rewrites, no downtime, and controlled cutover
Common External Decoupling Use Cases
CICS/IMS Transactions Without Disrupting Channels
- External apps continue calling CTG as before.
- Interceptor and bridge route calls to modernized Java services running in containers or serverless.
- Ideal for banks, insurers, and government agencies that need to modernize CICS/IMS while keeping 3270, web, and partner traffic stable.
Decouple Messaging from Legacy MQ Queues
- Apps that rely on MQ queues don’t change their connection details
- The adapter intercepts MQ messages and forwards them to event-driven services (Kafka or cloud-native messaging).
- Perfect for organizations shifting from point-to-point MQ integration to streaming or event-driven architectures
Replace Direct Database Access
- External systems keep using the same DB endpoint (e.g., Oracle, DB2).
- The Interceptor forwards queries to a modernized persistence layer (microservices with their own databases) while optionally reading legacy tables for fallback.
- Common in retail, logistics, and healthcare where multiple apps share a single “big” legacy database.
Incremental Core Modernization
- Backend functions move from COBOL to Java or are replaced with SaaS/packaged solutions.
- External consumers remain unaffected during the transition because gateway traffic is redirected behind the scenes.
- Ideal for large, multi-year modernization initiatives where channels cannot be broken.
Hybrid Cloud Adoption
- You run workloads across mainframe and cloud.
- External interfaces stay the same; External Decoupling manages which calls hit the mainframe vs. cloud services.
- Reduces risk in phased migration and long-term coexistence scenarios.
Key Benefits at a Glance
65% faster migration
Migrate backend systems
much faster than channel-first rewrites.
Zero ui changes
Employees and partners experience no interruptions
during migration.
40% lower TCO
Significantly cut costs by gradually retiring unnecessary middleware layers.
Cloud-Ready from Day 1
Instantly usable by AI, ML, and other innovations through secure APIs.
Net result:
You can start integrating modern systems, APIs, or external innovations immediately—your decoupled external services are fully operational, secure, and ready for immediate use from day one.
How External Decoupling Works with
other Decoupling Patterns
External Decoupling is one part of a broader, pattern-driven modernization strategy:
Data-Layer Decoupling
Extract data access into dedicated data services so you can move from legacy databases to modern, cloud data platforms
Internal Decoupling
Modernize internal modules (e.g., Accounts, Claims) one at a time while keeping internal program calls working via generated proxies.
Together they provide
Internal Decoupling
keeps modules talking
Data-Layer Decoupling
keeps data accessible and governable
External Decoupling
keeps channels stable
Frequently Asked Questions
External Decoupling is a modernization pattern that redirects existing CTG, MQ, IMS, or database traffic into modern cloud services while keeping user-facing channels unchanged. Consumers continue calling the same gateways, but the OpenLegacy Hub generated interceptors routes requests to modernized backends.
External Decoupling is safer because it keeps all channels and integrations stable and moves backend logic in small, controlled steps. Instead of rewriting everything and cutting over in one weekend, you redirect specific flows and queues incrementally and can roll back traffic to the legacy core at any time if KPIs or SLAs are at risk.
OpenLegacy Hub automates External Decoupling:
- Modernization Planner discovers gateway traffic and proposes which CTG/MQ/IMS/DB endpoints to decouple and in what order.
- Integration Studio generates the adapters, mappers, and service contracts that bridge legacy gateways to modern services.
- You deploy adapters and services, then cut over traffic gradually, with built-in observability and rollback.
External Decoupling is widely used in:
- Banking and insurance – to modernize CICS/IMS transactions while keeping teller systems, broker portals, and partner integrations running.
- Public sector and healthcare – to refresh backend services without impacting citizen or clinician-facing apps.
- Retail, logistics, and manufacturing – to evolve order, inventory, and supply-chain systems without breaking store, warehouse, or partner interfaces.
Any organization with long-lived channels tied to mainframe or IBM i gateways can benefit.
Yes. External Decoupling is a core enabler of phased mainframe-to-cloud migration. It lets you run new services in the cloud and redirect selected CTG/MQ/IMS/DB traffic to them, while the mainframe continues to serve other flows. Over time, more traffic is moved to the cloud, and legacy integration points can be retired safely.
No. While the pattern is especially powerful for mainframe gateways (CTG, MQ, IMS Connect), the same approach applies to IBM i, midrange, and legacy database gateways where external consumers should not be forced to change as you modernize backends.
Timelines depend on scope, but External Decoupling is designed for quick wins:
- Initial assessment and prototype can often be delivered in weeks.
- First production flows (for a specific transaction, queue, or DB endpoint) typically go live in a few months, not years.
- Subsequent flows are faster, because you reuse patterns, adapters, and governance already defined in OpenLegacy Hub.
No. External Decoupling is tool-agnostic. Existing ESBs, API gateways, and iPaaS can continue to call CTG/MQ/DB as usual. OpenLegacy sits behind those integration points, intercepting and routing traffic to modern services without forcing a re-platform of your integration stack.
Ready to Modernize Gateways with
Zero UI Disruption?
External Decoupling with OpenLegacy Hub lets you keep every channel online while you redirect CTG, MQ, IMS, and database traffic to modern services in the cloud. You protect users and partners, reduce migration risk, and create a cloud-ready backend that’s ready for AI, analytics, and whatever comes next.