Service-Oriented Architecture vs Microservices: Understanding Your Options (and Legacy Modernization Paths)

Most enterprises rely on software applications for many of their key operational activities. Time was, these applications were always based on monolithic architecture. In more recent years, there have been various different alternatives developed, including both service-oriented architecture and microservices architecture.

We’re going to delve deep into the service-oriented architecture vs microservices debate, and help you better understand both, as well as which might be the best option for you. 

Service-oriented architecture (SOA) vs microservices: Key takeaways

• Microservices vs service-oriented architecture is a discussion born out of the need to replace or modernize legacy monolithic systems. 
• SOA is an approach to software development that encompasses all aspects of enterprise-level development and focuses on the services you use and provide.
• Microservices architecture comprises loosely coupled and specialized components that work independently but are connected by Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).
• The benefits of SOA over monolithic architecture include boosts to collaboration and easier maintenance.
• Advantages of microservice vs service-oriented architecture include simplified process adoption, enhanced error tolerance, and extensive modularity.

Difference between SOA and Microservices: At-a-glance

Understanding the difference between microservices and SOA isn’t wholly straightforward. There’s a lot of nuance, which we’re going to get into shortly. However, as a starting point here’s an at-a-glance microservice architecture vs service-oriented architecture comparison table:

SOA meaning

Image source

So, what is SOA? As the name suggests, service-oriented architecture focuses on the services you use and provide, and is an approach for building a software environment—and software—that encompasses all aspects of enterprise level development.

Therefore, the immediate service-oriented architecture advantages are that your developers can achieve reusability of components from your enterprise’s existing applications.

SOA allows for the development of a series of modular web services across your organization that can easily communicate with each other and thus support all your applications.

One standout feature of SOA is that it allows for an easy communication protocol between any different platforms you use (such as Microsoft Azure or Amazon Web Services [AWS]), as well as different programming languages such as Java (through using JMS or Java messaging service).

SOA’s structure is based on the idea of decreasing the coupling between the applications you use (also known as decoupling or loose coupling). This allows two applications to communicate with each other even if they’re completely different.

In turn, this leads to improved business functionality and makes the development of new software and software architecture easier.

If you choose to go down the SOA route, you will find there are four different SOA services you can utilize:

• Functional: This is the general SOA service relating to all your business-oriented apps.
• Enterprise: This service is used when you want to implement specific functional services.
• Application: used by your DevOps team for developing and deploying new apps.
• Infrastructure: This aspect of SOA services is used for non-functional features, most often used for authentication and other security aspects.

What is microservices architecture?

Image source

Microservices and SOA both promote service-based design. Microservices emphasize bounded contexts, independent deployment, and decentralized data, often without a centralized ESB. 

Using APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), the different components of your microservices architecture pattern communicate with one another. Every microservice you use is focused on a single business domain/function and organizes a dedicated network for that function.

With microservices, you can combine components to create more complex apps and also higher-level services. Modernizing your legacy system with microservices architecture and middleware lets you create applications’ systems as single-purpose units that are mostly unique from each other.

The structure of microservices is fairly simple and straightforward. Any applications you use are broken down into specific functions and objectives. If you look at the image above, you can see how an e-commerce app has been built using microservices and that there are three essential features to that app:

• Accounts/finances
• Inventory and inventory management
• Logistics and shipping

If you’re using microservices, the architecture dictates that each of those features has its own independent components. Those components have their own independent data storage.

This is a basic principle of microservices architecture; every resource must be a standalone feature that can communicate with others when needed via a messaging system.

Microservices architecture can make your developers’ jobs far easier as it lets them not only update the codebases with little effort, but also allows for scalability without using different code components. 

Microservices mean your teams can choose and create different tech stacks and bounded context for component sharing and then connect them all using APIs.

You will also find that with microservices, fault tolerance and load balancing levels are high because every component manages itself independently.

When using—or creating—applications based on microservices, they’ll most likely be hosted on the cloud, offering better efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Benefits of SOA over older monolithic architectures

Service-oriented architecture was initially developed as a better alternative to older, monolithic systems. In that regard, SOA does boast a number of benefits:

Boosts collaboration

A major issue within larger organizations is that there can be communication and collaboration problems due to silos, particularly between business services and your IT teams.

With SOA, all independent services are defined in business terms, making collaboration easier and allowing different areas of your business to work better with your developers to ensure better results from your business processes and apps.

Loose coupling

Because every SOA service includes all the code and data to complete individual functions, service interfaces provide loose coupling (also known as decoupling).

That reduces interdependency between applications as the interfaces need little or no knowledge of how the actual service is implemented.

Aligned project development

Before SOA existed, connecting your apps to relevant data—and its granularity and functionality in other systems—was a complex process involving point-to-point integration. This process had to be replicated for every new development project.

SOA ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) means that developers can reuse existing capabilities and align the development of different projects.

Easy to maintain

Your IT managers know that software lifecycles can mean costly maintenance (or replacement) as well as potential downtime of systems.

With SOA, it can be easy to maintain, update, or modify one service without affecting the functionality of other services. This all makes it easier for your IT staff to work on SOA systems due to its modularity.

Benefits of microservices vs SOA

While SOA does represent a step up on those monolithic systems, it’s still far from perfect and that’s why many enterprises are looking towards microservices. Here are some key benefits of microservices vs SOA:

Simplified process adoption

If you choose microservices to modernize your legacy systems, then it’s easier to adopt new tech and processes when updating your tech stack. This means you can expand the apps that you offer with little to no difficulty. Combining microservices with APIs can lead to easily scalable tech stacks.

Enhances error tolerance

With SOA, the use of an ESB means that a single error could cascade into other aspects of the application.

With microservices architecture, you get a higher degree of error tolerance. If an issue does arise with one service, then only that microservice would be affected, and the others would function as expected. There is also the issue of value for money, and many businesses seek to reduce reliance on Tibco ESB. 

Extensive modularity

Because microservices architecture offers extensive modularity, your DevOps or IT teams can deploy new and independent apps without affecting any other area of your architecture.

This means your developers can add new modules without making any changes to your system. It further means that you have the freedom to add new features and dependencies as and when you need them.

Flexible and can stand-alone

Microservices are cloud-based and native, and thus, mean your developers can build and deploy standalone applications designed to perform a specific function.

This offers you and your DevOps teams more flexibility than other options as they can develop more agile, scalable, and resistant applications that offer different services.

Streamlines DevOps

Speed in your workflow can often be crucial when it comes to application or software development. Microservices allow your application development teams and IT teams to work closely together. Decentralization also means that innovation happens faster, your teams have more control over tech stacks, and can manage development and release faster, too.

Enables independent scaling

If you’re still working with a monolithic system, then every time you scale a single component of an application, you usually need to scale the entire application, too. With microservices, you can identify which services or components need to be scaled and then scale each independently of the others.

Microservices and service-oriented architecture examples

Of course, it’s all very well comparing the benefits of service-oriented architecture vs microservices architecture and considering how they might affect your organization. But how do these two options actually work in the real world?

Looking at real-life examples of how businesses have adapted either type of architecture can help you see how one or the other might work for you.

Microservices

Image source

Credicorp

Like many other financial institutions, Panama’s Credicorp faced real challenges in modernizing its monolithic architecture and embracing the era of digital banking.

Using OpenLegacy’s platform for API/microservices integration meant that the bank could quickly transform its service and use customer data to give it a true 360° view of customer wants and needs and achieve automation of many services.

Isracard

Another financial institution, but focusing mainly on credit cards, Isracard faced the challenge of integrating a new IVR (Interactive Voice Response) system with its legacy mainframe containing customer data.

OpenLegacy offered a microservices integration solution that was integrated faster and cheaper than other options.

SOA

Delaware Electric

Utility company Delaware Electric faced real issues due to a five-year freeze on electricity prices imposed by the state. They needed to integrate systems that didn’t communicate with each other, so that they could remain solvent. Using SOA architecture helped them achieve that goal.

Independence Blue Cross

Healthcare service provider Independence Blue Cross needed a system that would allow different teams (such as customer service agents or physician’s offices) to access a “single source of truth” in relation to patient information.

Implementing SOA ensured that all constituents involved could access accurate data in real-time.

SOA vs microservices: Which is right for you?

Deciding which option is better for you will depend on a number of factors, such as particular use cases, the current level of IT infrastructure, resources, and short and long-term business needs. What that means, in reality, is that there is no definitive answer as to which of the two is better.

However, that said, in many cases, businesses will prefer to opt for microservices as they will bring multiple advantages.

While SOA offers high levels of integration through ESBs, deployment tends to be far slower and more complex than microservices architecture, so this is something to think about.

Microservices architecture is usually easier and faster to build and deploy as individual services are smaller and thus can be deployed more quickly. SOA may be more suited to organizations needing a solid communication platform and messaging protocols, but microservices offer the speed, flexibility, agility, and lower costs many businesses desire.

Mainframe & IBM i realities (often missed in SOA vs microservices debates)

In legacy-heavy estates, SOA and microservices must respect a few non-negotiables. 

Firstly, many core flows are stateful, such as CICS/IMS units of work or IBM i commitment control, so designs that assume stateless calls can break transactional integrity. 

Tooling gaps are real; 3270/5250, MQ/CTG/IMS Connect, COBOL/RPG program interfaces, copybooks/EBCDIC/packed decimals, and Db2 for z/OS types often aren’t first-class in generic connectors. 

Finally, security and governance (RACF/ACF2, MFA, audit, residency) and performance/back-pressure demand specialized gateways and patterns must also be considered. These constraints argue for a phased path—not a big-bang rewrite.

Modernization-first playbook: Decouple, coexist, migrate

Those legacy-heavy realities should lead enterprises to a modernization-first playbook to reduce risk:

1. Decouple a boundary (domain/transaction/dataset) and expose it via secure, standardized APIs.
2. Coexist: Keep channels and operations online while gradually shaping traffic toward modern services; maintain rollback.
3. Migrate at your pace; measure outcomes and retire technical debt wave-by-wave.

Decoupling patterns you can mix & match

To execute the playbook, combine patterns as needed:

• Internal decoupling lets refactored modules call what remains on mainframe/IBM i via remote APIs with no downtime. 
• External decoupling preserves existing 3270/5250 or gateway channels while you shift logic to cloud services. 
• Data-layer decoupling moves embedded SQL to data APIs and supports hybrid reads/writes with CDC. 
• Logic-layer decoupling extracts business rules from legacy screens into reusable services. 
• CDC/data sync keeps legacy and modern datastores aligned to enable low-risk cutovers.

Where OpenLegacy fits—historically and today (capability snapshot)

Historically, OpenLegacy accelerated integration by exposing core system functions (mainframe/IBM i) as standardized APIs.

Today, OpenLegacy supports modernization-first programs: Identify safe decoupling points, generate modernization-ready APIs (no/low/full code), and run legacy–cloud coexistence with structured cutovers—avoiding middleware lock-in.

This lets enterprises adopt SOA or microservices where they fit best, while pursuing a phased, domain-by-domain journey to the cloud.

FAQs on SOA vs microservices

When should I use microservices?

Microservices are an ideal solution in the following scenarios:

• When you have lots of simple projects that are easily broken down
• If your business wants agile development and a continuous delivery process
• When you have complex application services that can be broken down or have already been broken down
• If your DevOps teams and your applications benefit from multiple programming languages, frameworks, and tech in the same environment
• When your organization wants to optimize its use of cloud computing, especially through containerization

When should I use service-oriented architecture?

SOA can be particularly useful if you want to achieve any of the following:

• Communication between lots of independent apps. This can often be done with SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol).
• Supporting a single application environment that uses multiple data sources
• Building and deploying a service that can be used in different areas of your enterprise
• Achieving serverless functionality
• Sharing functionality and/or data with external clients or partners.

What is the main purpose of service-oriented architecture?

The main purpose of SOA is to ensure that software components can be reused and that they’re interoperable by using service interfaces.

SOA services use common user interface templates, so it’s easier to incorporate them into any new apps. It helps solve the issues posed by a fragmented IT architecture as well as the difficulties in working with IT infrastructure services and app silos.

What are the characteristics of service-oriented architecture?

The main characteristics of SOA include:

• Supports high levels of interoperability
• Allows for vendor diversity and heterogeneous solutions
• Helps promote discovery
• Increases your service consumer quality
• Supports loose coupling (or decoupling) anywhere in your project.

Architecture choices aren’t binary. For enterprises with mainframe or IBM i systems, modernization succeeds when you change one boundary at a time. A modernization-first approach (decouple a domain via secure APIs, run legacy and cloud in coexistence, then migrate at your risk) reduces risk and preserves uptime.

How do SOA and microservices change when you have mainframe or IBM i systems? 

Legacy estates introduce constraints that generic guides skip. Plan for:

• Stateful transactions (CICS/IMS units of work, IBM i commitment control) that require transactional integrity and rollback.
• Protocol/data gaps (3270/5250, MQ/CTG/IMS Connect, COBOL/RPG program interfaces, copybooks/EBCDIC/packed decimals, Db2 for z/OS data types).
• Security/governance and performance (RACF/ACF2, MFA, audit trails, residency, throughput/back-pressure).

A practical path is to decouple a boundary via secure APIs, run in coexistence, then migrate domain-by-domain.

What is the safest way to modernize without disrupting 3270/5250 channels?

The safest way to modernize without disrupting 3270/5250 channels is to use external decoupling. Keep existing channels and gateways unchanged while routing to modern services behind the scenes. This supports phased cutovers and rollback readiness.

When should we favor SOA, microservices, or a hybrid decoupling approach in a legacy-heavy environment?

• Favor SOA when you have shared enterprise capabilities with contract-first services and mediation.
• Favor microservices in the case of independent teams/contexts with frequent deploys and decentralized data.
• Opt for hybrid with decoupling in mainframe/IBM i scenarios requiring safe, phased modernization (decouple → coexist → migrate).